Yes, when the government has unreasonably delayed a decision on an immigration petition, you can sue to force the government to act. The specific name for this legal action is a mandamus.

What is a “mandamus” action?

Mandamus is a Latin term meaning “we command.” A mandamus action asks a court to order the government to do a specific thing that it is obligated to do by law. To quote the law underpinning the mandamus action, 28 U.S. Code Section 1361: “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.” In the context of business immigration, the “plaintiff” is typically the petitioner (usually the employer).

In the context of immigration law, there are many things the government is required by law to do. When it fails to do those things, we can typically ask a district court to command the government to do them. It is important to understand that a mandamus action only compels the government to act – it does not command the government how to act.

What does a mandamus action look like in practice?

Mandamus actions have been successfully used to compel the government to process a variety of petitions and claims, including immigrant and nonimmigrant petitions (including H-1B, J, and L visas), requests for employment authorization, scheduling of naturalization interviews, and adjustment of status claims. A mandamus action can be particularly helpful where the government has either not responded to your requests for updates, or has provided vague reasons for delay. In these and other examples, by filing a mandamus action, the employer asks a district court to command the government to reach a decision on the application.

Can I use a mandamus action to compel the government to grant my petition?

No. Remember that a mandamus action cannot be used to require the government to decide one way or the other. In other words, through a mandamus action the employer cannot ask the court to tell the government to grant the petition – only to reach a decision. The government may very well decide to deny the petition. (If you’d like to learn more about what options exist if your petition is denied – including suing the government.

My delayed application is with a U.S. consulate. Can I file a mandamus action against a consulate?

Yes, you can file a mandamus action against a consulate.

What is an “unreasonable delay”?

There are a number of considerations that go into answering this question. To start, check whether the agency in question (for example, USCIS) has posted processing times for the specific application you have filed. Sometimes the agency will explicitly state how long an application should take. The agency’s website is usually a good place to start.

If no agency processing times have been posted, there might be timelines established by law (for example, timelines have been established for the processing of petitions for employment authorization).

The best approach, however, is to speak with a qualified immigration lawyer if you believe your petition has been unreasonably delayed.

What do I need to show in order to win a mandamus action?

As the plaintiff in a mandamus action, you must show three things:

1. That you have a clear right to the “relief,” or government action, you are requesting,

2. That the government has a clear duty or obligation to perform that action, and

3. That there is no other remedy available to you. This means that you have “exhausted” all other reasonable alternatives available to you, including, for example, reaching out to the supervisor at the government office at issue, and to your local congressional office. A qualified immigration lawyer can help you navigate these alternative approaches before filing a mandamus action.

How long does it take for a mandamus action to be decided?

It is important to remember that “resolution” of a mandamus action does not require that the judge reach a decision – many of these cases resolve through settlement and the government deciding to act on your application. There tends to be a benefit to having a federal judge who does not work for the immigration agency or the executive branch take an objective look at your case. Many times even the threat of a lawsuit and judicial oversight is all that is needed to motivate the government to act.

If the case does move forward, the amount of time needed for a mandamus action varies depending on a number of factors, including the judge and how the government opposes the suit. Remember, however, that the case is in your hands. If you decide not to move forward at any point, you can withdraw the case.

Won’t the government simply deny my petition, or retaliate against me if I sue them?

This is a common concern, and it is important to know that, in spite of pursuing a mandamus action, you might continue to experience delay or denial of your petition. That being said, mandamus actions are not uncommon, whether inside or outside the context of immigration, and are a useful, effective tool for forcing the government to act. At a minimum, mandamus actions are an opportunity to invite a judge to oversee what the government is doing.

By and large, we are seeing that mandamus actions do not tend to result in denials. The government has reason to act with integrity as it responds to these suits – a clear pattern or practice of prejudice or abuse by the government against plaintiffs could expose the government to liability, particularly when a judge is actively exercising oversight as a result of your lawsuit.

That being said, if there is an underlying issue that justifies delay of your case, this could very well result in a denied petition. One of the important things a qualified immigration lawyer should do is assess whether your case is appropriate for a mandamus action, based on the integrity of the underlying petition.

Should I work with a lawyer if I decide to file a mandamus action against the government?

Yes. It is critical that a lawyer not only assist with navigating federal court litigation, but also that they assess whether your case is a good one to sue on. There are many cases that seem like good candidates but are actually not. We can help you make that determination.

Blumsack & Canzano
In a world of uncertainty, you and your family may want to maximize their choices—both in terms of lifestyle and opportunities. Whatever your motivation, Blumsack & Canzano always has trusted immigration advisors. We deliver comprehensive solutions and a seamless immigration experience for you, your family, and your advisors around the world.

The experienced immigration lawyers at Blumsack & Canzano provide various legal services to employers, employees, individuals, and families in the Boston area and other areas. Immigration issues are complex, and if they are not handled properly, they may have serious impacts. We have an in-depth understanding of immigration law and are committed to providing customers with comprehensive solutions in all areas of immigration law. 

What litigation can and cannot achieve

A delayed application should first be evaluated against its procedural status, relevant processing information and prior inquiries. Mandamus and unreasonable-delay litigation have jurisdictional and legal requirements. Filing does not guarantee approval or a decision within a fixed period.

Coordinating related legal issues

For a delayed application, organize receipts, evidence requests, inquiries and documented effects of the delay. USCIS delay issues and consular processing problems require agency-specific analysis. The Department of State’s administrative-processing guidance provides consular context, not a promise of a completion date or a particular litigation outcome.

Before considering further proceedings, establish whether the case is awaiting action, requires evidence or has already received a decision. Delay-litigation assessment depends on accurate records, and organizing evidence for litigation helps clarify the requested relief and factual basis. Compare the filing with the relevant USCIS forms and instructions so an unfinished application step is not overlooked.

Place personal history, travel arrangements and official notices on a single timeline when preparing for an interview or overseas processing. Interview preparation and assessment of consular delays may involve different agencies. Read the Department of State’s administrative-processing information alongside the case notice, without treating a general process description as a guarantee about the outcome.

Organize identity documents, previous applications and official notices chronologically. Reviewing the filing and status history can reveal inconsistent descriptions; the applicable eligibility category determines which facts need proof. The USCIS green-card application overview provides a starting point, followed by the current instructions for the relevant forms and procedure.

Begin immigration planning by identifying the application basis and distinguishing petition approval, visa issuance and admission. Permanent-residence eligibility requires a review of the full history, while overall status planning should account for dependents and existing proceedings. Use the USCIS green-card categories to identify the relevant route rather than applying one category’s requirements to another.

Keep originals, provenance and complete translations for documents issued abroad. Cross-border document review may overlap with evidence of immigration eligibility, but the purpose of each record should be clear. Check the relevant USCIS form instructions; acceptance by one institution does not establish that the same document satisfies another application’s requirements.

For an employer-related application, compare the job, employment records and descriptions in the filing. Employment-based immigration may need coordinated review with wage and working-relationship issues. The USCIS employment-based green-card guidance provides the framework; an employer’s willingness to support a case does not establish that every eligibility requirement has been met.

Personal history, marital status and document dates should be accurately presented in a marriage-related filing. Marriage green-card interview preparation may overlap with marriage, divorce and family-document issues. The USCIS guidance on immediate-relative green cards helps identify the application context, while proving the relationship remains separate from meeting other immigration requirements.

Separate government fees, translation and document costs, and legal-service fees when planning an application. The application category and procedure determine the paperwork involved, while an employment-based case may involve responsibilities shared among different parties. Check the current USCIS fee schedule before filing instead of relying on amounts in an old article or receipt.

Preserve original records when litigation becomes a realistic possibility, and distinguish documents already available from evidence held by others. Pre-dispute document review serves a different function from discovery in litigation. The Massachusetts discovery resources help frame requests around disputed facts, so that useful evidence is not buried in unrelated material.

Start by separating the outcome you want from the facts you can document. For contract or damages litigation, organize agreements, payments and communications chronologically. Checking the parties and underlying records can reveal gaps before positions harden. The applicable Massachusetts civil procedure rules should then guide procedural planning; the volume of documents alone does not establish the strength of a claim.